(October 16, 2013 at 6:08 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:(October 16, 2013 at 12:47 am)Godschild Wrote:
Simple.
The manger and the shepherds are part of Luke's story, not Matthew's.
The two stories don't sync. That's my point.
Why was it necessary for Matthew to include these things in his writings? Luke put these in his writings, and they do not conflict with each other, one gives more detail than the other is the only true difference. Also it was prophecy that Jesus would be born in a manger, do you really believe Matthew would not have known this? As I said before history is put together by using details from some writings and then details from other writings and confirmed by other writings. You did not respond to this either, curious.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.