The Good Samaritian

[Waratah]

---

Whether english or an aboriginal dialect is my primary language is irrelevant to my post. Just another stalling tactic by drich. "You can't handle the truth".

It makes a big difference, because i know that some cultures have a hard time understanding some of the subbtle neuaunces of english. If you were one of these people it would go a long way in explaining why you have such a hard time distingushing between an inconsistancy and a lie. a lie is different from an inconsistance because it denotes intent.

something you have failed to proove in every single instance you have attempted to identify me as a liar. You simply point to an inconsistancy and assume a lie has been told. Maybe for you or your tribesmen this is a socially acceptiable way to identify someone who has provided you with an inconsistant statement. But, here in the world outside your tribe, one has to be able to not only show an inconsistancy, but intent to be deemed a liar..

Now ask yourself have you done this once? (not have you tried, but have you via 'proof' been able to establish intent.) Now ask yourself why? One viable opion I see is there simply is no evidence, and yet you are still trying to be deceptive in order to dimiss what i have said with out nutting up and addressing actual content, But that would be highly hypocritical.

The other possiable reason I see is that your culture simply does not judge people the same way those who live in western soceity does.

So Option A you are a deceptive hypocrite who's intent is to BS himself out of a conversation, by putting his opponet on the defensive or forcing him to stoop to your level and personally take the other person means and motives into consideration and hijack the conversation away from content you can not possiable defend with your limited knoweledge of the subject matter being discussed.

-or-

Option B you just do not know any better because your indiginious culture does or can not distinguish between someone providing an inconsistant statement and one who's intent is to deceive.

---

I chose option B simply because if you are one who culture is similiar to my own, and after the 50 or so times you call me a liar, but have failed to prove intent, but still yet know the defination of liar/LIE liedly·ing \ˈlī-iŋ\

Definition of LIE
intransitive verb
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lie

I do not have to prove intent. You left out the second definition of lie.

Definition of LIE

intransitive verb
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression

By you leaving out definition number 2 you created a misleading impression that a lie had to have intent.

So by trying to defend yourself, you lie. Well done drich

---

then that would have made you the liar and a hypocrite now wouldn't?

I like to give people the benfit of the doubt, even one who has been trying to hound dog me. That is why i asked if you were not born into or apart of western culture, by asking if english was your primary language or not .

My mother is korean, and she has a hard time with things like this sometimes. If this is what is wrong with you, then maybe I'll back off and be alittle more understanding. If not, and your just some douche bag who has mistaken patients for weakness, then you better break out your favorite lube and brace yourself, because I will have some fun with you before i get board and place you in the minnie pile.

---