The Good Samaritian

[Waratah]

I do not have to prove intent. You left out the second definition of lie.

Definition of LIE

intransitive verb
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression

By you leaving out definition number 2 you created a misleading impression that a lie had to have intent.

So by trying to defend yourself, you lie. Well done drich

Again I ask are you ignorant of basic English and general comprehension of western soceity?

I do not believe so. Especially since I have pointed out to you the meaning of conceded. I also know that no amount of asking will turn into a knock. I also know that in luke 11 it clearly states to receive the holy spirit you only have to ask, not a/s/k.

Or are you pushing for more intentional deception?

Loaded. What deception?

Or do you have a third option?

If you feel you have an understand English and western soceity I ask, What does it mean to create?

Create: to make or produce (something) : to cause (something new) to exist

: to cause (a particular situation) to exist

: to produce (something new, such as a work of art) by using your talents and imagination

As in to "create a false understanding?"
Wouldn't creation of this deception indicate intent?

Don't know.

If your belief is that creation does not include or reflect any intention then please give an example where creation spontaneously occours and does not include intent.

Look at your posts for lies. Whether you have intent or not only you can answer that if you have insight into your conscious and subconscious. I point out many times you false statements. I have asked you before whether you have misspoken and you chose to ignore my question. Then you start this thread to say you have misspoken. I would say that you were trying to be deceptive. but hey I could be wrong and you may answer my question on the same thread that I asked , where have you misspoken? After that the next time that you misspeak and I point it out to you, you can acknowledge your mistake. Then I would not be thinking that you are lying on purpose.

Otherwise know intent is critical to BOTH understandings of this word.

Now if I had your understanding of a liar I would be calling you one now, and get to hound dog you.

I do not "hound dog" you because you are a liar. I confront your assertions. You either fail to provide proof or ignore my posts.

Because by what you have said, and what you posted you omitted 3/4 of the definition lie to only provide the two you thought were revelant and yet represented those two definitions as the only definitions of the word lie. Which by your own standard makes you a liar. So I ask you using your own logic and own definitions explain to me why in this situation you are not a liar.

All I had to show was that you do not have to have intent for a lie. The very next line(the one you omitted) did just that. I believe that you had intent to create a misleading impression but I can't prove intent. The thing is I do not need to.

Now stop derailing your own thread that you created to avoid my questions in our discussion and get back to the other thread and reply to my posts.

---

So warpath, it been a couple of days, are we done with your limited understand of the word neighbors and how it can be used scripturaly?

Loaded question. You have added nothing new to your argument that I have already shown to be false in the other thread. You have refused to post a reply. Now that we know that you have lied about you reason for using neighbour instead of friend we are actually back onto the neighbour issue once again because of this thread.

What of your you misuse of the word liar?

Lie.

Shall we proceed to the next topic in the A S K discussion we were having?

We can't because you keep stalling. Go back to the thread.

Or are you done?

No

Typically I do not chase after people when they stop responding to a given topic, but since you were compassionate and understanding (I will admit to lying here because you were not either of these things) when I made a mistake, I feel the need to ensure that not only do you see yours but acknowledge it publicly as well, not to gloat, but to make sure the next time you feel intimaditated or inadequate because you are not equip to discuss the subject topically, that you do not feel you have the option to march this red herring/liar bit back out.

Whatever

Know I will not beat you with the deceptions I have caught you in up to this point, unless you want to default to this tatic in the future. I will make a note of this thread and will march it back out if you attempt to do the same.

Whatever

Now it is upto you on how we proceed. Do you wish to address the next line of the A S K arguement we were having or are you done?

I asked you why you insisted in using neighbour instead of friend on the 28/9/13. I have asked many times and all you have done is make assertions which have been shown to be false.