Sorry drich nothing I seem to say will get you back to the other thread. You say you will if I do this or that. When I do this or that it is still not good enough for you.
How can I be misrepresenting the word lie. This is not my definition. It is merriam-webster.com definition. I followed your link because you can never trust what you say. I went to the word lie labelled with a number 3 where I found your definition listed. With that definition was another definition (which you left out) which clearly shows to me and everyone else (anyone else here can prove me wrong here if I am) except you that intent does not need to be shown.
2: to create a false or misleading impression
I suspect that you do see that you do not have to have intent, because in one of your posts you say "In EVERY Single instance a lie is primarily defined as an intent to mislead."(my bolding). I think you are just pissed off because you thought that you were giving me all this rope to hang myself with and it has backfired on you.
Whether you lie with intent or not still does not change the fact that you have asserted things in our discussion which have been found to be false on many occasions. Even when they have been pointed out to you, you have continued with the same assertions.
My honest belief is that you are a liar with intent, whether you know it or not. Yes I know I cannot prove it but I think that you have made a pretty good case against yourself. You have done the work for me. You are a liar and everyone knows it.
You have no integrity.
I could not honestly give a shit anymore what you have to say. You just cannot accept that you have poor comprehension skills. You make up shit that is not there. You have run away from our discussion many times and I have tried to confront you about luke 11 and your bullshit a/s/k theory. Just keep running.
I may keep the other thread open just in case you change your mind.
How can I be misrepresenting the word lie. This is not my definition. It is merriam-webster.com definition. I followed your link because you can never trust what you say. I went to the word lie labelled with a number 3 where I found your definition listed. With that definition was another definition (which you left out) which clearly shows to me and everyone else (anyone else here can prove me wrong here if I am) except you that intent does not need to be shown.
2: to create a false or misleading impression
I suspect that you do see that you do not have to have intent, because in one of your posts you say "In EVERY Single instance a lie is primarily defined as an intent to mislead."(my bolding). I think you are just pissed off because you thought that you were giving me all this rope to hang myself with and it has backfired on you.
Whether you lie with intent or not still does not change the fact that you have asserted things in our discussion which have been found to be false on many occasions. Even when they have been pointed out to you, you have continued with the same assertions.
My honest belief is that you are a liar with intent, whether you know it or not. Yes I know I cannot prove it but I think that you have made a pretty good case against yourself. You have done the work for me. You are a liar and everyone knows it.
You have no integrity.
I could not honestly give a shit anymore what you have to say. You just cannot accept that you have poor comprehension skills. You make up shit that is not there. You have run away from our discussion many times and I have tried to confront you about luke 11 and your bullshit a/s/k theory. Just keep running.
I may keep the other thread open just in case you change your mind.
