(October 24, 2013 at 2:32 am)cato123 Wrote:On second thought, you may just not understand so I'll try again.(October 24, 2013 at 2:20 am)catfish Wrote: You have your example of a "'useful" religion as I stated.
"Undefiled" is the opinion of the author, do I really need to give each of you guys an English lesson with each post or are you intentionally being this way?
Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this,(everything before this is author's opinion/commentary) (eveything after this is the description of this unnamed religion) To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
Notice the bolded portion above? I did not miss your feeble attempt... (although I really expected you to demand a god to be produced which this unnamed religion could be undefiled before also)
So again, I ask that you pay attention to what I write.
What the fuck is wrong with you? You still have yet to provide an example of an undefiled religion.
The sentence after the blue above was my example of a usefull religion as I claimed. "Undefiled" is your requirement because the lead-in to the described religion contained it.
Seriously, 5th grade English taught us sentence structure here in the states. The root of the first sentence is "Religion is this," which since I needed an example of a usefull religion to rebut another's post, I choose to use. My claim was a "useful" religion, get it now?
(October 24, 2013 at 2:32 am)cato123 Wrote: Sure, you have now qualified the definition, but you have yet to give an example.See above.
(October 24, 2013 at 2:32 am)cato123 Wrote: Also, I thought the Bible was the word of God (or at least inspired by God). Didn't you just vehemently proclaim that you don't speak for God? Which is it?
Which is what? Which strawman exactly are you trying to build?
