The Good Samaritian

[Waratah]

Sorry drich nothing I seem to say will get you back to the other thread. You say you will if I do this or that. When I do this or that it is still not good enough for you.

Not true. I show you and told you specifically what you need do. This statement is a lie.

According to you, you need to prove intent ya drich.

How can I be misrepresenting the word lie. This is not my definition. It is merriam-webster.com definition. I followed your link because you can never trust what you say. I went to the word lie labelled with a number 3 where I found your definition listed. With that definition was another definition (which you left out) which clearly shows to me and everyone else (anyone else here can prove me wrong here if I am) except you that intent does not need to be shown.

You have created a fasle or misleading impression when you over look the first two words of this defination "To Create" Which indicates an intent or an intention to bring something into being. I also gave you oppertunity to give an example of the creation of something that did not involve intent to create. you failed to do this, rather you employed a red herring in hopes to avoid this discussion.

I will make it clearer for you. To create does not mean it must have intent ya drich.

Person B goes to create a fried egg that has a runny yoke.

Person B creates a fried egg that is burnt and the yoke is not runny.

Person B created a fried egg that is burnt and the yoke was not runny without that intent. Get it yet, ya drich.

I suspect that you do see that you do not have to have intent, because in one of your posts you say "In EVERY Single instance a lie is primarily defined as an intent to mislead."(my bolding). I think you are just pissed off because you thought that you were giving me all this rope to hang myself with and it has backfired on you.

show me.
you have established yourself as a liar in practice and have admitted as being a liar, you even demonstrated that an entire posts can be written to demonstrate this ablity... So did my efforts back fire? As I watch you circle the toilet bowl of lost intergrity I'd say no.

I noticed how you did not address my point about you using the word primarily.

Whether you lie with intent or not still does not change the fact that you have asserted things in our discussion which have been found to be false on many occasions. Even when they have been pointed out to you, you have continued with the same assertions.

Again you as a well established liar must provide examples. you have demonstrated many many times your word can not be trusted.

Assertion. Since you only believe that a lie must have intent, please provide proof of my many lies with intent ya drich.

My honest belief is that you are a liar with intent, whether you know it or not. Yes I know I cannot prove it but I think that you have made a pretty good case against yourself. You have done the work for me. You are a liar and everyone knows it.

The difference between us? You have been proven by defination and action, and you even have gone as far as to admitting to being a liar, and all we have is your 'word' based on your "feelings" that because there is an inconsistancy in what I have said that I am as you have been proven and admitted to be.

You admitted to being a liar, "Oh, I do lie, I am no saint." (my bold and italic). The difference between us is when one of my mistakes are pointed out to me I will acknowledge my mistake, pretty much straight away. Anyone who has followed our discussion will have seen this. Where you have been shown many times your errors and have refused to acknowledge them.

You have no integrity.

Says the liar.

You got me there ya drich

I could not honestly give a shit anymore what you have to say. You just cannot accept that you have poor comprehension skills. You make up shit that is not there. You have run away from our discussion many times and I have tried to confront you about luke 11 and your bullshit a/s/k theory. Just keep running.

I may keep the other thread open just in case you change your mind.

I have not run from anything.

This is the fifth thread that our discussion has spread. Go back to Evolution Trumps Creationism thread if you have not run from anything. Is the above statement an attempt to create a false or misleading impression with intent or no intent?

I have simply asked that you tell the truth about your goto answer. Meaning if you wish to proceed with out on going discussion you must be willing to put down you lazy catch all answer.

You are weird. It is my questions that you keep avoiding. Does this mean you will not just say I am a lying without proof?

For example we will start out in a discussion, and you will argue what you can, and when you run out of topical content you default to name calling, or you you try and dismiss everything without having to actually address anything by calling me a liar.

Please show me where I have name called after running out of topical comment. Stop lying.

It is you who does not address things. Could you please address my points in THIS POST? Your last reply did not actually address my post, just accuse me of my english skills.

If we are to proceed then you need be man enough to put away the play ground tactics. Either you can answer me point by point or you cant.

It is my questions that you are avoiding.

IF you can't you need to deal with your inablity by accepting what I've said or walk away from this conversation. Not try and bully me or wear me down with accusations.

Maybe you should acknowledge your falsehoods then you would not feel worn down.

The slack you were afforded gave me enough ammo to bury you in factually based accusations of my own if you want to play this game.

Oh yeah drich I have been shot to pieces, ya drich. Your whole big ammo thing is, a lie must have intent, which I have shown to be false.

However if you wish to proceed, we can proceed if you promise to curb the playground bully B/S.

Well that is easy since I have not been doing that. Go forth to the other thread.