You may have noticed....or perhaps not, you being you, that I am not D-P.
I'm nowhere near as tolerant of bible stupidity as he is. He's a good man.
No. Fuck your gospels. I don't give a shit about your gospels.
The first Roman writers to mention this shit speak of christians or chrestians or christos or chrestus. They know nothing about any "jesus" until the late second century as shown in Celsus c 180 AD.
Who knows? Perhaps there were other derogatory comments about some schlepper named "jesus" but when xtian thugs burned the libraries these were all lost. That's what you get for destroying knowledge. The earliest Roman writer who heard of your godboy was not until 180 AD and he wasn't impressed!
I'm nowhere near as tolerant of bible stupidity as he is. He's a good man.
No. Fuck your gospels. I don't give a shit about your gospels.
The first Roman writers to mention this shit speak of christians or chrestians or christos or chrestus. They know nothing about any "jesus" until the late second century as shown in Celsus c 180 AD.
Who knows? Perhaps there were other derogatory comments about some schlepper named "jesus" but when xtian thugs burned the libraries these were all lost. That's what you get for destroying knowledge. The earliest Roman writer who heard of your godboy was not until 180 AD and he wasn't impressed!
Quote:"Let us imagine what a Jew- let alone a philosopher- might say to Jesus: 'Is it not true, good sir, that you fabricated the story of your birth from a virgin to quiet rumourss about the true and insavoury circumstances of your origins? Is it not the case that far from being born in the royal David's city of bethlehem, you were born in a poor country town, and of a woman who earned her living by spinning? Is it not the case that when her deceit was uncovered, to wit, that she was pregnant by a roman soldier called Panthera she was driven away by her husband- the carpenter- and convicted of adultery?"
Celsus 180 AD
