(October 29, 2013 at 11:32 pm)Informative2016 Wrote: I'm not mistaken, you've clearly underestimated the statement. Congratulations, you've thought of mythological creatures, which CAN be proven to be unreal based on their nature. On the other hand, God can NOT be proven to be unreal, no one has done so. You've acknowledged God, good job. You cannot prove that He does not exist. I on the other hand can disprove your claims because they are MYTHOLOGICAL creatures, God is not.I of course don't think that you mean to say what I've just read from you. You're not saying that something is likely true if it cannot be proven false, correct?
(October 29, 2013 at 11:32 pm)Informative2016 Wrote: Anselm, one of the GREATEST Philosophical thinkers stated my first claim. Hence,by thinking of God, you've already acknowledged Him, you can choose to deny Him in your life, but you cannot deny the fact that God does no exist, no one can. How does this make someone dishonest? And I apologize that there are smarter people than you.
I don't question for a second your intelligence. You are clearly the better man to teach things of this sort. I just want to make sure I understood you correctly. Are you saying that a claim is authenticated as true once the subject of it has been uttered from the mouth of the one who objects it? Is this true in all cases or just with God? Excuse my ignorance and share with me your knowledge.
