(October 29, 2013 at 11:32 pm)Informative2016 Wrote:(October 29, 2013 at 3:56 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
Unicorns.
Dragons.
Griffons.
Werewolves.
Vampires.
You are quite mistaken.
I'm not mistaken, you've clearly underestimated the statement.
I think you need to spend some time with a thesaurus. Why don't you go ahead and tell us all how one underestimates a statement? I've heard of people misunderstanding a statement. I've heard of people contemplating or ignoring a statement, but I've never heard of someone underestimating a statement. "Clearly Cogsworth, I underestimated that statement. I thought for sure it would never amount to anything, but low and behold, it went and grew up into an entire paragraph."
Quote:Congratulations, you've thought of mythological creatures, which CAN be proven to be unreal based on their nature. On the other hand, God can NOT be proven to be unreal, no one has done so.
Again, more painfully flawed logic there little guy. A dragon, for example, is a myth only because we haven't seen one, and unfortunately for you, your god shares the same attribute. Of course, we believe in neither, but it has absolutely nothing to do with their 'natures.'
Quote:You've acknowledged God, good job. You cannot prove that He does not exist. I on the other hand can disprove your claims because they are MYTHOLOGICAL creatures, God is not.
So, you can disprove a mythological creature because its a mythological creature? Excellent. I'll only need one piece of evidence than: Simply type that those alleged mythological creatures are MYTHOLOGICAL creatures in ALL CAPS and that will be sufficient for me. Dare I say, all of us will be convinced in the scientific process you have used to demonstrate your point, thus bringing us all that much closer to believing in your awesome and powerful god.