(October 30, 2013 at 11:00 am)bennyboy Wrote:(October 29, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Informative2016 Wrote: Your response is too vague. You would not like to elaborate on that? I mean you are already accepting the fact that there is a higher power, by this you are acknowledging that there IS a God. Why do you choose not to believe in Him?
Apologies if anything interesting has happened since page 1. I couldn't get past this comment.
How do you interpret "Because a god does not exist" to "You are acknowledging that there IS a God"? Are you fucktarded, or am I missing something?
He's using the ontological argument. Basically as soon as you consider God he exists.
Amongst the many flaws in the argument is the idea that his God and a perfect entity have anything in common.
The perfect entity, by definition, is actually not God. The perfect entity doesn't suffer from vanity, pride, wroth or jealousy.
Plus the perfect entity obviously has large breasts as I have argued before.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!