(October 31, 2013 at 10:21 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I propose Option #3, D-P. "Jesus" was a much later interpolation into the story.
Baby steps, Min. Baby steps. He's still unable to wrap his head around the concept that the Gospels didn't accurately depict the teachings of John the Baptist. Just notice his floundering on his "counter points".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
