(November 1, 2013 at 2:53 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: You do know that in his early days he was a lawyer so there would be court records from your country that confirm his existence.It's circular to say it's verifiable because it's been verified. What are the criteria that determine if something is verified/verifiable?
So we have court records, government records, coroners records, Newspaper accounts, photographs all of which can be VERIFIED i.e. demonstrated to be true.
Why does anyone even say verifiable, rather than verified?
Quote:But on top of this Lincoln was only a man. There is nothing remarkable to prove. Its not like someone is pretending that he was some bullshit impossible magic man.I'm comparing this to the Jesus myther position - that there wasn't a man behind it at all.