RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
November 4, 2013 at 8:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2013 at 8:25 pm by snowtracks.)
(November 3, 2013 at 10:09 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(November 3, 2013 at 9:15 pm)snowtracks Wrote: so we have this situation: naturalism is propounding the idea that without a blueprint, that the eye was assembled, likewise the brain; each assembled independent of the other. then the idea came up - that it would be good to connect them with an optic nerve. then some backing and filling took place to get the focus correct. in the meantime, it was decided that chemicals and blood would be needed to supply the energy and that was hook-up.
So, you're a goddamn idiot: the evolution of the eye is amazingly well mapped, from simply light sensitive cells, through to a cupped proto-socket to allow for directional light, and so on and so forth. And of course the brain came first, but you seem to have this idiotic idea- befitting your status as an arrogant moron- that both evolved instantaneously, separately, and within a single organism. As I've mentioned multiple fucking times, across multiple fucking threads, these changes are gradual, and occur within the framework of the changes that have come before; it's not whoosh, brain, whoosh, eye, whoosh connection between the two.
Maybe you could actually fucking know what you're talking about next time, before you start spouting your mouth off like a goddamn fool?
this one seems angry about something.
since i posted, haven't really seen any cogent rebuttal argument from the atheist who like portray themselves as the 'intellectual ones'. have some dawkins (do the evolutionist genuflect every time his name is mentioned?) , squid eyes, and ranting but beyond that, not anything of substance.
must be something to what i posted since it's appear "she's protesting too much". beginning to think, must be a philosophy that's being protected since no one is stepping forward to explain how those busy little molecules, like bees buzzing around, just want to seek and achieve greater complexity.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.