(November 4, 2013 at 8:24 pm)snowtracks Wrote: since i posted, haven't really seen any cogent rebuttal argument from the atheist who like portray themselves as the 'intellectual ones'. have some dawkins (do the evolutionist genuflect every time his name is mentioned?) , squid eyes, and ranting but beyond that, not anything of substance.
must be something to what i posted since it's appear "she's protesting too much". beginning to think, must be a philosophy that's being protected since no one is stepping forward to explain how those busy little molecules, like bees buzzing around, just want to seek and achieve greater complexity.
Personally, I have wasted too much time and effort on people such as yourself that feel as if they are challenging science when, in fact, they are merely demonstrating their ignorance of said science.
If you think that people feel the need to protect their philosophy from your "challenges," you're even more deluded than you first appear.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
