1) You said Evil is the absence of good, but indifference is also the absent of Good, and indifference is not evil.
So how do you discern between, evil, indifference and good? Saying Evil is the absence of good clearly brings a false dichotomy.
2) Too simplistic, what are the other factors?
If Good is simply the absence of evil, and there exists places in which there are no good, and god is (as you have said yourself) everywhere and everything, then god cannot be 'all good' or rather God is partly evil.
You're going to have to come back to me with your modified description of good and evil and your definition of what and where God is and whatever else you think might be relevant, as it stands the logical conclusion is that God is not 'all good' as claimed.
So how do you discern between, evil, indifference and good? Saying Evil is the absence of good clearly brings a false dichotomy.
2) Too simplistic, what are the other factors?
If Good is simply the absence of evil, and there exists places in which there are no good, and god is (as you have said yourself) everywhere and everything, then god cannot be 'all good' or rather God is partly evil.
You're going to have to come back to me with your modified description of good and evil and your definition of what and where God is and whatever else you think might be relevant, as it stands the logical conclusion is that God is not 'all good' as claimed.
.
