It is inevitable that any challenge to a fundamentalist's views on religion, somehow move into a conversation about evolution (an attempt at an attack by the theist specifically). I always find this quite curious that this seems to be a constant. I have numerous questions about this.
1) Why not attack other scientific theories, like relativity or gravity or plate tectonics?
2) Do theists think evolution is somehow weaker?
3) Is it more strongly related to the fact that loud-mouth fundamentalists have been doing it since Darwin, so they just keep going?
4) How does it logically follow that if evolution is false, that religion must be true?
5) How would one disprove evolution? (with science or religion?)
1) Why not attack other scientific theories, like relativity or gravity or plate tectonics?
2) Do theists think evolution is somehow weaker?
3) Is it more strongly related to the fact that loud-mouth fundamentalists have been doing it since Darwin, so they just keep going?
4) How does it logically follow that if evolution is false, that religion must be true?
5) How would one disprove evolution? (with science or religion?)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/FJovzGlbuoEXm/giphy.gif)
