I think the general problem with things like Maximally Great Beings is that what is 'great' is essentially subjective. If one's idea of what an MGB is contains the attribute of omnibenevolence, it would seem that an ontological argument could establish the existence of an MGB with that property inversed to be omnimalevolence. And it doesn't seem you could claim the benevolent one is inherently greater than the malevolent one, because then you're special pleading from your own set of values from what I can tell.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 4, 2025, 6:58 am
Thread Rating:
Terrible Atheist Argument #1
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
God is a terrible explanation for anything. | theVOID | 18 | 4852 |
November 10, 2010 at 3:14 am Last Post: God |
Users browsing this thread: 33 Guest(s)