Is god axiomatic?
November 18, 2013 at 8:02 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2013 at 8:18 pm by Ronga.)
It can neither be proven or disproven.
So that basically leads to what i know called "Immanence and Transcendence"
Here's a lecture.
immanence (inside this world) Basically, what we know to be true within this world, what we have knowledge of here, right now, scientific evidence and other needs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanence
transcendence (Outside this world) That is used with things that are unknown to us, like, what happens when we die. In which part is unknown to us still.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcenden...eligion%29
![[Image: image006.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=staffweb.hkbu.edu.hk%2Fppp%2Fksp2%2FKCR5_files%2Fimage006.gif)
Basically, what is inside this triangle is "Immanence", what is outside is "Transcendence"
Another example:
![[Image: deleuze3.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=strawberrymillefuille.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F02%2Fdeleuze3.png)
Let me know what you think?
So that basically leads to what i know called "Immanence and Transcendence"
Here's a lecture.
immanence (inside this world) Basically, what we know to be true within this world, what we have knowledge of here, right now, scientific evidence and other needs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanence
transcendence (Outside this world) That is used with things that are unknown to us, like, what happens when we die. In which part is unknown to us still.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcenden...eligion%29
Basically, what is inside this triangle is "Immanence", what is outside is "Transcendence"
Another example:
Let me know what you think?
