(November 19, 2013 at 9:06 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote:(November 19, 2013 at 5:00 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Read that again...and turn off the projector.
OK, you said that you were reading over the article and noticed that it claims children do better with their biological parents. And this for some reason means that the article has an agenda and that there is a "rat" involved, as you put it.
So, I think my question is a fair one.
Yep. Its a perfectly legitimate question.
Look at domestic violence stats for post-divorce, 'blended' families where there is a step-dad raising someone elses kids. Much higher rates of violence than for biological fathers.
I cant believe people think that non-biological adoptive/defacto parents is just as optimal as biologically-related (heterosexual) parenting.
Two gay men dont have lactating breasts. How on earth can they provide the scientifically proven benefits of maternal breast milk?
