RE: Refuting fundamentalists
November 19, 2013 at 9:50 pm
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2013 at 10:08 pm by pineapplebunnybounce.)
Yea, cos that's what's parenting is about, the quality of breast milk.
ETA: You are also completely missing the point. So what if one person is a better parent than another? That's probably something that can be demonstrably proven whether it's hetero or homo parents. Does that give you the right to say, ok you're not the best possible model, so we'll take your child away, OR from now on, no more kids for you. You're violating people's right to have children. So I don't understand what is the point of this exercise. Does being biological parents make you immuned to cancer, car accidents, affairs, genetic diseases? Are you just so much more superior than adoptive parents? Really? Because adoptive parents are adoptive parents because the biological parents GAVE UP their children or died. What kind of advantage does being biological parents can possibly give you that will even be significant? Would you ever tell someone who has a family history of cancer that they shouldn't have children? Or people with family history of heart disease and obesity? Or soldiers and policemen/women who risk their lives at work? So why do you feel entitled to tell homosexuals they shouldn't have children?
ETA: You are also completely missing the point. So what if one person is a better parent than another? That's probably something that can be demonstrably proven whether it's hetero or homo parents. Does that give you the right to say, ok you're not the best possible model, so we'll take your child away, OR from now on, no more kids for you. You're violating people's right to have children. So I don't understand what is the point of this exercise. Does being biological parents make you immuned to cancer, car accidents, affairs, genetic diseases? Are you just so much more superior than adoptive parents? Really? Because adoptive parents are adoptive parents because the biological parents GAVE UP their children or died. What kind of advantage does being biological parents can possibly give you that will even be significant? Would you ever tell someone who has a family history of cancer that they shouldn't have children? Or people with family history of heart disease and obesity? Or soldiers and policemen/women who risk their lives at work? So why do you feel entitled to tell homosexuals they shouldn't have children?
