(November 19, 2013 at 11:33 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote:(November 19, 2013 at 11:26 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Repeat the experiment 100 million times and get back to me with the results.
Opposite-gender mate selection and heterosexual (gender-balanced) parenting of human offspring has been "doing great" for 50,000 years.
Did you not read what I said about experiments at this scale? It's not reasonably doable (especially when gay marriage is such a new thing, which means no official records, which means active recruiting). Which part of that is so hard to understand?
You certainly can do such an experiment. It's being done in some jurisdictions right now. Give it time. Nature will gradually take its course over time. Take a hundred million babies and raise them in adoptive, same-sex defacto parenting arrangements and see how things turn out.
(November 19, 2013 at 11:33 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: ...You can't even substantiate your claim that if you compare 100mil homo couples and hetero couples the result will be in your favour. Go ahead and try and present your result. Since you're already so sure that it worked well historically, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find data.
This from the person who sarcastically mocked the importance of maternal breast to the welfare of children.
(November 19, 2013 at 9:50 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: Yea, cos that's what's parenting is about, the quality of breast milk.
What do you think about drinking alchohol while pregnant? No biggie? Kids turn out just fine? If a woman is being used a a surrogate mom for gay husbands Mitch and Cam to adopt, would it be OK for her to drink during pregnancy?
After all - its not as if she has to worry about the future welfare of the donated baby.
