RE: Refuting fundamentalists
November 20, 2013 at 12:07 am
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2013 at 12:07 am by Mystical.)
I'd say you Mehmet don't care about children if you'd rather them grow up rotting in an orphanage than being with two fully functioning and loving parents.
You know there's mental illnesses acquired from lack of parental stimulation, right? Same mental illnesses that are avoided through parents no matter the gender of said parents?
Prove to me why those kids deserve to be mentally ill rather than in a home.
You know there's mental illnesses acquired from lack of parental stimulation, right? Same mental illnesses that are avoided through parents no matter the gender of said parents?
Prove to me why those kids deserve to be mentally ill rather than in a home.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
