Refuting fundamentalists

[Esquilax]

kılıç_mehmet,
See how Esquilax keeps mistakenly referring to the facts of natural history as a ''fallacy'' of appealing to tradition?
It's like he seems not to understand the difference between repetitive data and nostaligia.

Except you can't claim that natural history backs you up, moron, because the natural world is brimming with homosexuality, and those groups work out just fine. What you're mistakenly referring to as "natural history," is, in fact, a human cultural construct based around a religious need to alienate the other into some separate, lesser group. It's got nothing to do with nature, and I think you knew that when you made your dishonest comparison.