(November 19, 2013 at 9:06 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote:(November 19, 2013 at 5:00 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Read that again...and turn off the projector.
OK, you said that you were reading over the article and noticed that it claims children do better with their biological parents. And this for some reason means that the article has an agenda and that there is a "rat" involved, as you put it.
So, I think my question is a fair one.
I emphasized through indenting the word that raised my bullshitometer. Since I didn't read the link thoroughly, I didn't also indent 'biological', even though I suspect bullshit there, too.
Stating that I was surprised was you putting words in my mouth, or an assumption that something you take to be true was/is everybody's position.('Biological' parents are necessarily better for snotlickers) If so, you are the one surprised. Ergo, projecting.
Isn't the important thing a loving , caring relationship between a child and parent? Finding which combo (single, married, gay, adopted, mormon mothers, etc...) works 'best' seems a secondary concern. Well, unless you are looking for ammunition to use against your favorite group to hate. If a poll of everybody on the planet shows(like that is possible...) lesbian couples make the best parents, should lesbians try to shame and legislate away hetero couples? Of course not. Good eggs, and bad, are found in every demographic. Papers like this can cause more problems than they're worth.
