Terrible Atheist Argument #1

[Statler Waldorf]

And I don't get why Plantinga made this argument anyway. Isn't making an argument for the existence of God an evidentialist apologetic approach, which as a reformed epistemologists, Plantinga must reject a priori?

Plantinga is an evidentialist and not a presuppositionalist.

---

Special pleading.

"God created everything!"

"How do you know?"

"Nothing exists without a cause!"

"What caused God?"

"Nothing caused God!"

"So God has no cause?"

"Of course!"

"So God doesn't exist?"

"..."

Try again.

---

I am not aware of anyone who uses the premise, “nothing exists without a cause”- usually it is framed as, “everything material has a cause” or “everything that has a beginning had a cause”. Neither of which would apply to God.