I find it funny most Christians will argue with elaborate logical arguments with all these fancy names. But this question is a basically has only one answer that is faith, thus defeat the entire crux of any argument, unless you can prove god real intent. Which apparently according to his book he says not to do.....am I the only who finds this strange and suspicious? I might not articulate elaborate arguments or use fancy wording, but I think it is interest what questions apologists choose to debate. I not meaning that antagonistic I merely observing the responses to this thread vs other (granted the obvious misspelling of my title), thank you adhd for that one.
![[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_GaCN-f8ZFo%2FUNfmimTyf4I%2FAAAAAAAANmk%2FoakT_wL319U%2Fs1600%2Fgrumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg)
I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.