Terrible Atheist Argument #1

[Statler Waldorf]

Nor would they apply to the universe if that is understood as having proceeded from a form of nothingness which contained everything as one of its potential states .. which seems to be the correct description by the way.

Are you trying to argue that the Universe is not made of material and did not have a beginning? Are we now going back to the steady state theories of the 1920s?

@Stal Everything I've read keeps saying he's a reformed epistemologist and has delivered heavy critiques of the evidentialist approach.

That’s odd because I have seen him argue against presuppositionalism, so maybe he is just not very consistent in his position. :/