This is primarily why I didn't accept the challenge. Why would I debate someone who will only agree to source his claims if I agree to accept them as fact and change my mind without ever seeing the evidence? If that's how I approached things, I'd still be a Christian myself.
Anybody who calls themselves a Christian and believes in the basic tenets of Christianity is a Christian. You don't get to decide that people aren't Christian just because their crimes make your narrative difficult.
Anybody who calls themselves a Christian and believes in the basic tenets of Christianity is a Christian. You don't get to decide that people aren't Christian just because their crimes make your narrative difficult.