I have read most of Darwins works and found them to be more scientifically based as opposed to the whole god thing. Dawkins likes to take a stab at creationism every once in awhile but Darwin did not have to deal with creationism so much in his day. Back then it was basically science vs theology and even today that continues to be a war that I think will wage on forever. I have always said that trying to convert a theist through arguing from logic, reason, or scientific evidence is like trying to pull a lions teeth with your bare hands (futile). I like Dawkins thorough discussions on evolution but I just find him so boring as a writer.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/