RE: Theists, are you immune to being decieved?
November 26, 2013 at 6:22 pm
(This post was last modified: November 26, 2013 at 6:30 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(November 26, 2013 at 5:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Simple, there must be a governing agent causing material to behave in a manner that makes it possible to use such descriptions.
Oh it's simple alright. But, just because you say it "must" be true, doesn't get us any closer to establishing whether or not you are right. What you've offered is an intellectual sink-hole. The question remains.
(November 26, 2013 at 5:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I will ask you again, can you make sense of immaterial natural laws in a manner that is consistent with your espoused materialism?
I've already told you, I don't know. And it's irrelevant with regards to establishing the validity of your claim. I can't account for descriptive laws anymore than you can account for God. You've swapped one incomplete worldview for another, and are content in using God as your pacifier for your lack of knowledge. It seems a bit more honest to admit that you don't know, rather than go on pleading for exceptions for the very thing you're trying to avoid, and pretend to know things that you clearly do not. You're human, get used to being ignorant, it comes with the territory. You don't have all the answers, and insisting that you're right without evidence doesn't change my mind about you. Not that you are trying or care. But, then why would you continue this conversation if you didn't?
