I consider belief without evidence, I consider belief with evidence. But I choose evidence. I am sided with evidence because it is rational.
I consider anything without evidence, but I only believe with evidence - because that's sane.
What I said was not contradictory because I was saying that saying "I know of no evidence" does not mean that I won't consider any evidence - so where's the contradiction?
I can consider something seriously without believing but I can't consider something seriously and also believe without evidence -if I believe, I have evidence whether valid or invalid.
EvF
I consider anything without evidence, but I only believe with evidence - because that's sane.
What I said was not contradictory because I was saying that saying "I know of no evidence" does not mean that I won't consider any evidence - so where's the contradiction?
I can consider something seriously without believing but I can't consider something seriously and also believe without evidence -if I believe, I have evidence whether valid or invalid.
EvF