I don't see what the difficulty here is. Vinnie says "who created God" is a dumb argument. I would say it's more of a softball argument as sometimes it gets theists to think. But we can just agree it's dumb and move on to option ii, singularity as First Cause. That's what the evidence suggests, what the math suggests; and it is a model rather than an event that requires a cause.
In this sense, god, too, is a model; but there's one feature of the singularity that is totally opposite from god, i.e. minimal entropy. The Maximal Supertastic Being is also maximally entropic. Yet if we're to extrapolate from these nebulous god-concepts, God, who is said to be evidenced everywhere; we find that nature operates in complete contrast. Old men do not grow into embryos, nor do oaks mature into acorns. So it seems the First Cause can only be singularity.
In this sense, god, too, is a model; but there's one feature of the singularity that is totally opposite from god, i.e. minimal entropy. The Maximal Supertastic Being is also maximally entropic. Yet if we're to extrapolate from these nebulous god-concepts, God, who is said to be evidenced everywhere; we find that nature operates in complete contrast. Old men do not grow into embryos, nor do oaks mature into acorns. So it seems the First Cause can only be singularity.
