If I may repeat myself, I feel you are mis-characterizing me. I do not take anyone's word on anything because they fit my pre-conceived notion. I cannot disagree more strongly with that. I know you will tell me that I am lying, or that you know me better than i know myself (even though we've never met). But if I can please try to assure you, this is not "what you've been talking about". I don't think Vaccines are dangerous because fucking Jenny fucking McCarthy says. I did not see that she was the author of the article that linked to the discredited study.
But all I was asking was 'Hey, this may have merit, what do you guys think?" The response was clear, and I thank you all greatly for sharing what you thought. You are right, this is a discredited vaccine study, and the article was authored by movie stars. Thank you again for sharing that, I am happy to know. I am not arguing that Jim fucking Carrey is right, and that this is proof. I am accepting that you guys know this is discredited, and moving on. I pains me that you would think that my opinions on something as vast and important as Vaccine health would be based on one article (that I found after airing my views).
But keep telling yourself that I am a lone nut. I admit to puting my foot in my mouth with this one, but not to basing any opinion on it. I was asking if you guys thought this was valid. It is not, and you've made that point.
Thank you.
PS to VOID, you talked about how the children in the study were handpicked and mistreated. If I am not mistaken the study involved monkeys, not children. Clarification? Or am I still confused?
But all I was asking was 'Hey, this may have merit, what do you guys think?" The response was clear, and I thank you all greatly for sharing what you thought. You are right, this is a discredited vaccine study, and the article was authored by movie stars. Thank you again for sharing that, I am happy to know. I am not arguing that Jim fucking Carrey is right, and that this is proof. I am accepting that you guys know this is discredited, and moving on. I pains me that you would think that my opinions on something as vast and important as Vaccine health would be based on one article (that I found after airing my views).
But keep telling yourself that I am a lone nut. I admit to puting my foot in my mouth with this one, but not to basing any opinion on it. I was asking if you guys thought this was valid. It is not, and you've made that point.
Thank you.
PS to VOID, you talked about how the children in the study were handpicked and mistreated. If I am not mistaken the study involved monkeys, not children. Clarification? Or am I still confused?
