because God doesn't submit to peer review doesn't make it any less real, much like you being lost in your break believing you were Jesus. The analogy was accurate from my perspective.It is not insufficient by itself , unless it's non objectifiable. You can experience the results of an unexpected result from an experiment. It could be a random result that's not duplicatable because your parameters weren't limiting enough. We're trying to define those parameters still for God, who is outside the known universe, which makes it a lot more difficult than some beakers in front of us. In fact, experience is the best evidence tor the intangible. Sure it'd be great if it was duplicatable or exactly repaeatable, but that's the nature of the intangible beast.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
