RE: God is timeless
December 5, 2013 at 6:28 am
(This post was last modified: December 5, 2013 at 6:50 am by Angrboda.)
(December 5, 2013 at 6:09 am)enrico Wrote: Ben Davis
Look at here Ben.
I say.............When you think that the life is finite...you reply........Which I do... and then you say.............I don't know how often I have to correct you on this... never mind, I'll go again. Atheism, being an absence of theism, has no attributes on which to have faith or dogma. You do understand that saying "You're as bad as us" is no defense at all?
I don't believe Ben replied thus, at least not in this thread, and lifting pieces out of context from another discussion entirely to make a point in this one distorts its meaning, which is an ostensible example of the fallacy of contextomy, as well as being a violation of our rules on quoting at this forum. We recently, just, made some changes to our rule on accurately quoting people, and if you haven't, I suggest you avail yourself of the substance of that rule. That being said, while there were minor changes, the substance of the rule has not changed, and to my mind you are in multiple violation of both its past and present form here. I am simply going to advise you on the matter here, however... if you do not start properly quoting people, including backward links, if you quote mine people unfairly, if you paraphrase unfairly, if you are sloppy and reckless in attributing thoughts and words to others, if you continue to make these mistakes unrepentantly, I will not hesitate to call for the ban hammer with the aim of banishing you from this forum for good.
(ETA: And for what it's worth, you can be in London and Rome simultaneously, according to brane theory, provided the two are on separate brane, or the brane has folds such that the points occupied on the brane by London and Rome are coincident in an (imaginary) ultra-brane manifold space.)