Aleph Bet and DNA

[StrongWaters]

The word Mother is Aleph (Strong) Mem (Waters). The strong water is the catalyst for the combination of letters (DNA) forming Word (Proteins). The medium between the Father and Son is the Water, or catalyst bringing the two chiral halves together.

What a complete non-sequitur. I sense another deepity-spewer in our midst...

A sequitur is a link in a chain. By non-starter, you are implying that there is no connection in your mind between DNA, an alphabet of creation, Word (Sequence of letters) and the one claiming to be the author of those words. Is this about right? Maybe you should explain why you are missing so many links in the simple chain between letters and words.

Which of these three did you use to come to that conclusion: did you use Reason, Logic or Common Sense? I only ask, because you fail to add context to your argument.

Which type of non-sequitur? Again, you did not define, which leaves me with no other choice but to reason that you lack the connections in your mind to answer. Here are your choices:

1) Phenomenal non sequitur
2) Accommodation non sequitur
3) Emphasis non sequitur
4) Docetic non sequitur
5) Critical non sequitur

Based on these, let me ask you a few questions:

-Do things appear as they are, or are appearances hidden in in value? For instance, if I offer you a dime or a nickle, do you choose the nickle because it is larger to your sight, or do you choose the dime because it has more value you cannot see with your eyes? Do you choose both?

Do higher axioms presuppose accommodation to our own lower forms of reasoning, logic and commonsense? How thin do you need for me to slice the meat for you? Confucius: “grains cannot be too finely-ground and neither can meat be sliced too thin.” I tried to make it as simple as possible. Those were some large links for you I guess. I can slice thin if it helps you hear. Did you know that an Ear of Grain needs to swell with water before it can open and sprout a plant?

-Working from the last question, does it surprise you that the Bible uses the family structure to demonstrate the higher axiom of truth concerning DNA and how Word (information in chains and sequences) creates our reality by baptism? Baptism is our involution and evolution (rising to new life). Science has it wrong. Evolution is a result and not a cause. I get ahead of myself. You are still having trouble with two links. I better not add more at this point. We'll take it slow so you can get started.

-Do you discount the inspiration of God simply because man was used as the distal phalange to write the words? Do the words used match the pattern above and below? Why or why not?

-Does your assumption about errors in the Bible work from the presupposition that bits of information degrade over time and that information entropy is a result and not the cause?

Aleph Bet is the Alphabet. DNA writes Word (Chains of Proteins). For all combinations in nature, there must be a catalyst. I think that link is about as thin as I can make it for you. Tell me why you don't get it and maybe I can clear it up.