RE: Aleph Bet and DNA
December 8, 2013 at 9:03 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2013 at 9:03 am by StrongWaters.)
(December 8, 2013 at 8:30 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:Abusive fallacy.
Again, no. While I did offer abuse AND a personal attack, these were not fallacies, as the abuse was not intended as a disproof of your argument. I'll try again:
If I had said, 'Your argument is invalid BECAUSE you're an ignorant wretch', that would be a fallacy.'
What I actually said amounted to, 'Your argument is invalid because your phoenetic translations of Hebrew words is wrong. In addition to this, you are an ignorant wretch.' Stated this way, there isn't any possibility of a logically fallacious statement on my part. Come to think of it, I don't see any logically fallacious statements on YOUR part, either. You've simply got your facts wrong.
Happy to be of help.
Boru
It is a fallacy to say something is wrong apart from the facts to demonstrate your statements. The same holds for the rest of the comments on page two. You have a vast internet at your disposal. Back your statements with context or they are empty.
