RE: Aleph Bet and DNA
December 8, 2013 at 10:20 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2013 at 10:22 am by StrongWaters.)
(December 8, 2013 at 10:15 am)Esquilax Wrote:(December 8, 2013 at 10:01 am)StrongWaters Wrote: As the OP, I have the high ground as long as no valid arguments against the premise exist.
Two things: one, this is a blatant miscarriage of the burden of proof. You have the burden of proof, since you've made the claim; again, it isn't up to us to debunk every stupid claim you make, it's up to you to demonstrate them. We aren't going to just take your claim as true because you made them, else you'd have to do the same with my gcat claim earlier in the thread.
Two, the valid argument against your claim is that you've provided absolutely no evidence for it, and thus your claim is indistinguishable from crazy, delusional ranting. Enjoy!
Quote: The premise is that the Alephbet writes the Word. As a reflection of this simple truth, the rest of the chain rises when you pull the single link. This is your problem. You must cut the link if you expect to break the chain. My ship is anchored on truth.
Truth is demonstrated, not just asserted. If you can't show it, you don't know it, and you have provided absolutely nothing besides your demands that the things you say are true. Again, you wanting this to be true is not evidence that it is: do you have anything real?
Quote:It takes a higher axiom of truth to cut this ship loose. You can try. If you think there is a weak link, the set me adrift. You cannot do this by simply stating an opinion devoid of context to demonstrate your platform. You are only blowing in the wind if you try. I am anchored here in the harbor.
Do you get paid by the tortured metaphor? Is that a deal I can get in on?
Proof is in the OP. It's evident.
Romans 1
20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made...
DNA is the Aleph Bet. God makes the claim, then demonstrates at every turn. Unless you can argue the evidence in the OP, it stands. I can give you burden of proof, but you must first challenge the points made in the OP. The fact that no one has is the fact that you cannot.
Quote the OP, then challenge. Reveal the weak link in the chain. I found this truth by this process. Atheists are good at poking holes in logic and reason, but the OP has no holes. Give it your best shot, but don't shoot the messenger. Speak to the subject.
