Aleph Bet and DNA

[WesOlsen]

Once you arrive at a simple evident truth, it is pointless to assign intermediaries or partners to that truth. I can if you like.

Start with the premise. DNA is an alphabet. God claims the title Father, which is Aleph Bet, or the one producing the information that is then sent out. Word is a chain and sequence of information (letter), mirrored by the sperm traveling to the egg. This is mirrored by proteins made from amino acids (letters) of DNA in union with the other sex chromosome. There is a catalyst between the letters and the words. Water is the catalyst, or medium. God also claims this title as Aleph Mem, or strong water. In chemistry and in physics, chirality demonstrates my premise with no room for argument. The only way for two asymmetrical things to be superimposed on the other is with a symmetrical catalyst. You suggest there is no connection. I have demonstrated that there is. Scientific observation confirms me on every level. If you would like to deny, you must first show error in my premise.

Apart from translation invariance and symmetry laws, none of this is possible. God claims the laws and mirrors them with parable and proverb, which are outlines for the simple mind to understand. For instance, when God states that He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow, he is demonstrating invariant symmetry. Again, evident. The proof is above and below. What I show you is the root, or the fact that no other transitional intermediaries are needed to reduce as a foundation. Additionally, the higher axiom then resolves any contradiction or paradox below.

From the mouth of the Nobel Lauriates, here is the digital universe. It is founded on letters and word, or sequences of information forming logical symmetries. Those symmetries are translational by nature and never change, but instead change what they reveal. Light cannot be seen. It reveals what it hits. The light does not change.

For more on this, you might want to educate yourself on symmetry laws.

Invariance and Symmetry are Parallel to What God Claims about Himself.

The OP stands. You now have more proof to work around. Simply saying it is not true is empty.

What's in the well always comes up in the bucket.

There are a number of fundamental problems with your bombastic claim. Firstly, DNA is not true language. Abrahamic types love to assert that DNA is language, and that language must always be programmed by something or someone. Both assertions are completely false. DNA does not follow a power law. It communicates certain information but not in the same sense, therefore DNA is technically cipher, not language. Secondly, your understanding of DNA synthesis and the role (and omission) of other protein coders, such as RNA, is crude and incomplete. The comparison between a word and a sperm swimming is very unusual, as someone who works in pathology for a living i've never heard anyone comparing the act of a sperm transmitting chromosonal information to a word transmitting information. Human languages follow power laws, and words, sentences and scripts are subjectively interpreted at times, DNA does not follow the same rules.

"This is mirrored by proteins made from amino acids (letters) of DNA in union with the other sex chromosome"

Again, you assert that amino acids are perfectly synonymous with human letters. They aren't. And what about the other 22 pairs of chromosomes?

"God claims the laws and mirrors them with parable and proverb, which are outlines for the simple mind to understand. For instance, when God states that He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow, he is demonstrating invariant symmetry. Again, evident. The proof is above and below. "

God's word was demonstrably penned by men, not directly by god. This is hearsay not revelation. Claims on their own are not evidence for claims. You cannot prove what your particular god is stating because we can be sure that everything we have in written form was put there by humans. Therefore biblical literature is not evidence for god any more than the qur'an is evidence for Allah. Until you can prove that god said X, Y and Z we cannot even begin to move the argument towards step 2 (The DNA shit), although step 2 has already been torn to shreds just for our pleasure. Every time you say that "god says blah blah" what you actually mean is "I say blah blah because i'm convinced by some silly primitive fairy tales, penned by the scribes of jewish elders, who spend most of their time talking about mundane desert shit rather than proper mathematics or molecular pathology."

Your leaps are wild, your logic is completely barmy. You have demonstrated nothing other than your incredible capacity for gullibility.