Aleph Bet and DNA

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Err, no you don't. That's now how academic or logical inquiry work.

As Esquilax has already tried to elucidate to you, simply having a position does infer any sort of validity.

Some positions are so baseless and absurd that they can be dismissed outright, doubly so when do verifiable evidence is not produced to back up the assertion. Indeed, the burden of proof is entirely on you to present. Thus far your claims are irresolvable precisely because there is no evidence aside assertion. For this reason, they can be easily dismissed as nonsense until such a time that verifiable evidence can be forwarded.

Case in point. I am the abrahamic god.

Disprove my claim.

I am surprised that you didn't already understand this basic function of logic.

Once you arrive at a simple evident truth, it is pointless to assign intermediaries or partners to that truth. I can if you like.

...

The OP stands. You now have more proof to work around. Simply saying it is not true is empty.

Re read what I wrote. I never said that it wasn't true. I said that, so long as there's no evidence to back up your claim (there is no evidence), it can be dismissed as a baseless assertion.

You inferred god in your second paragraph. No such thing exists until proven.

There is nothing self-evident in your thesis. To claim that there is is illogical.