RE: Aleph Bet and DNA
December 9, 2013 at 1:07 pm
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2013 at 1:08 pm by StrongWaters.)
(December 9, 2013 at 1:01 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(December 9, 2013 at 12:52 pm)StrongWaters Wrote: Patently false. Baptism has evidence.The only evidence baptism provides is that your head will get wet when doused with, or submerged in, water.
You ignore the second video. There was no way for that child to know the details of what he remembered. This is proof, although these stories have existed for centuries. Evidence is not lacking. This is a well documented and studied topic. PHDs write books on the subject and study this topic over long careers. Books are available for this and out of body experiences that cannot be explained by logic and science. You are dead in the water with our pretext. You know it to be true. Ignorance ignores truth.
(December 9, 2013 at 1:05 pm)WesOlsen Wrote: God damn what a load of dellusional rambling crap. You addressed precisely fuck all from my response, which is that not only do you not understand molecular biology but that you've made some wild and highly subjective comparisons between DNA, which IS CIPHER, NOT TRUE LANGUAGE and some fucking Hebrew, which is just a fucking human language that evolved from some proto-semitic language group. All you've done is try and win the 'who can type the most shit' contest by pasting in endless bible quotes and rattle on about the light and holograms. This is easily amongst the most delluded stuff i've witnessed on this forum yet, the leaps of logic are baffling and it's really hard to even suss what you're yapping on about most of the time.
Bible quotes don't win arguments, because they are proof of nothing. As already stated, god didn't say shit, men said shit (and lots of it). The bible is a collection of claims, not evidence for claims. DNA does not follow a power law, it is not a language and your comparison of DNA/sperm and hebrew is retarded. These thoughts aren't shared by anyone in the scientific world, nobody in my lab would even give this rubbish a second thought because the connections are far too loose and irrational. If you presented this garbage, which is essentially jazzed up numerology wank, to any molecular pathology journal you'd be the laughing stock of the community. You may as well try to convince us that tree trunk rings are a true language. Complete and utter gibberish.
What's in the well comes up in the bucket. I cannot show you truth if you cling to error.
