Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 7:05 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sinners
#14
RE: Sinners
Quote:Yet Christians can't justify why Mary, mother of Jesus, herself was preserved from original sin.

Actually,I think the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is only found within that broad collection of refined ignorance and idiocy called 'Catholicism'. The logic is perfectly sensible ;Viz: Jesus is the son of god,therefore his mother would be completely without sin.

It was questioning the innately unjust nature of the doctrine of original sin which began my long journey to atheism.



Quote:The Immaculate Conception is, according to Roman Catholic doctrine, the conception of the Virgin Mary without any stain ("immacula" in Latin) of original sin. It is one of the four dogmas in Roman Catholic Mariology. Under this aspect Mary is sometimes called the Immaculata (the Immaculate One), particularly in artistic contexts.

The dogma states that, from the first moment of her existence, Mary was preserved by God from the lack of sanctifying grace that afflicts mankind and that she was instead filled with divine grace. It is further said by Catholics that she lived a life completely free from sin.[1] Belief in Mary's immaculate conception in the womb of her mother, through sexual intercourse, should not be confused with the doctrines of the virginal conception of her son Jesus, known as the Annunciation and the Virgin Birth.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate_Conception
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Sinners - by Darwinian - February 14, 2010 at 6:32 am
RE: Sinners - by downbeatplumb - February 14, 2010 at 7:01 am
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 14, 2010 at 7:52 am
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 14, 2010 at 1:33 pm
RE: Sinners - by Zen Badger - February 16, 2010 at 7:50 am
RE: Sinners - by LEDO - February 14, 2010 at 8:25 am
RE: Sinners - by Welsh cake - February 14, 2010 at 11:50 am
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 14, 2010 at 3:33 pm
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 14, 2010 at 5:01 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 14, 2010 at 5:22 pm
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 14, 2010 at 5:53 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 14, 2010 at 6:13 pm
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 14, 2010 at 6:58 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 14, 2010 at 8:14 pm
RE: Sinners - by padraic - February 14, 2010 at 8:49 pm
RE: Sinners - by peace2u - February 15, 2010 at 6:35 pm
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 16, 2010 at 3:16 am
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 15, 2010 at 8:22 pm
RE: Sinners - by peace2u - February 16, 2010 at 7:16 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 16, 2010 at 8:32 pm
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 17, 2010 at 12:43 am
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 17, 2010 at 4:31 am
RE: Sinners - by tavarish - February 17, 2010 at 4:05 pm
RE: Sinners - by Darwinian - February 15, 2010 at 10:18 pm
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 17, 2010 at 4:26 am
RE: Sinners - by Purple Rabbit - February 17, 2010 at 5:09 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 17, 2010 at 5:03 pm
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 18, 2010 at 4:55 am
RE: Sinners - by downbeatplumb - February 18, 2010 at 4:07 pm
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 18, 2010 at 8:22 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 18, 2010 at 8:29 pm
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 18, 2010 at 9:15 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 18, 2010 at 9:28 pm
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 18, 2010 at 10:03 pm
RE: Sinners - by fr0d0 - February 19, 2010 at 8:35 am
RE: Sinners - by tackattack - February 19, 2010 at 10:27 pm



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)