(December 15, 2013 at 8:15 pm)insider432 Wrote: Nitinol is a great example of this suppression of information and technology. It remained classified for over 40 years and has been declassified a few years ago.Which is funny, because I've just found a few articles pointing to it's use in medical and commercial applications back to at least the mid-80s.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 27, 2025, 2:42 am
Atheist Forums
›
Discussion
›
Skepticism & Pseudoscience
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
Thread Rating:
|
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
|
 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Atheist Forums
›
Discussion
›
Skepticism & Pseudoscience
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? | ignoramus | 26 | 7044 |
February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am Last Post: Asmodee |
|
| Can you still be an atheist if you believe in the paranormal? | Regina | 28 | 9714 |
February 14, 2015 at 1:36 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
| Fundamental flaw in the creation/evolution debate | Baalzebutt | 34 | 12298 |
May 1, 2013 at 2:46 am Last Post: AtheistPilot |
|
| "Creation Science", "Flood Geology", etc | Justtristo | 10 | 6057 |
December 21, 2010 at 7:17 pm Last Post: Justtristo |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
