Yes, science proceeds on the basis of methodological naturalism, precisely because the focus of its study is the natural world. This is as it should be. The problem is when some people, like Mr. Crichton, confuse this with ontological naturalism, i.e. "the philosophical belief...". Ontological naturalism is not a scientific position.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 23, 2025, 10:52 am
Thread Rating:
Does Science Presume Naturalism?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Your position on naturalism | robvalue | 125 | 24612 |
November 26, 2016 at 4:00 am Last Post: Ignorant |
|
Presumption of naturalism | Captain Scarlet | 18 | 4993 |
September 15, 2015 at 10:49 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
On naturalism and consciousness | FallentoReason | 291 | 64064 |
September 15, 2014 at 9:26 pm Last Post: dissily mordentroge |
|
"Knockdown" Argument Against Naturalism | Mudhammam | 16 | 6985 |
January 2, 2014 at 10:42 pm Last Post: Angrboda |
|
Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism: A Refutation | MindForgedManacle | 0 | 1221 |
November 21, 2013 at 10:22 am Last Post: MindForgedManacle |
|
rational naturalism is impossible! | Rational AKD | 112 | 42811 |
November 1, 2013 at 3:05 pm Last Post: TheBeardedDude |
|
Argument from perpetual identity against naturalism. | Mystic | 58 | 14934 |
March 24, 2013 at 10:02 am Last Post: Mystic |
|
Response to Arcanus on Metaphysical Naturalism | Tiberius | 11 | 5250 |
March 31, 2010 at 6:04 pm Last Post: RedFish |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)