Honestly, Harris' argument for a science-based (or at least scientifically-investigatable) moral system is nonsense. The only way it has a chance of working is by his defining 'science' as far more broad than it actually is. And further, I could play this same game: It's possible to define philosophy as anything to do ith thinking. An apparently science-based moral system involves thinking. Therefore, said system is actually based in philosophy.
See why defining things that widely is plain dumb? o.o
See why defining things that widely is plain dumb? o.o
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
-George Carlin