Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 13, 2025, 3:04 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The gunslinger fallacy
#4
RE: The gunslinger fallacy
Hmm I saw something like this a few weeks back. My JW brother-in-law posted an article on Facebook about evidence that JW's who refuse a blood transfusion heal faster and with less complications than non JW's who do have transfusions. After shaking my head and facepalming a little I did some digging and found the original paper which had some interesting details. The numbers of participants was 322 JW's vs 87,543 non-JW's and the article also neglected to mention the footnote in the paper saying that any surgeon knowing the patient would refuse a transfusion would only consent to the procedure for the patients most likely to have less complications, thereby skewing the results considerably.

Edit: here's the abstract if anyone is interested.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751620
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The gunslinger fallacy - by Jacob(smooth) - December 16, 2013 at 4:29 am
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by max-greece - December 16, 2013 at 5:58 am
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by Doubting Thomas - December 16, 2013 at 2:30 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by StuW - December 16, 2013 at 2:45 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by Jacob(smooth) - December 16, 2013 at 3:07 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by TheBeardedDude - December 16, 2013 at 3:49 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by JesusHChrist - December 16, 2013 at 4:16 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by Doubting Thomas - December 16, 2013 at 4:42 pm
RE: The gunslinger fallacy - by LastPoet - December 17, 2013 at 4:06 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)