RE: Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
December 17, 2013 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2013 at 3:35 pm by Mega Saga.)
Am sure you can get any man made book and try to find meaning in it threw numbers. This is not proof of creation. Also you just included that nature has mathematical patterns which doesn't prove creation.
The concept of creation is self-contradictory.
The concept of creation is impossible. From “nothingness”, only “nothing” can emerge. Given that creation, as a reality, is self-contradictory, GOD’s existence is impossible.
God Is Impossible By definition, creation requires that nothing initially exist, yet to affirm that from nothingness anything whatsoever could materialize, would be self-contradictory. After all, if someone really wanted to create something, just remember what there would be to work with… nothing! And nothing is nothing, no matter what kind kick-ass illusionist might want to fashion from its confines. Trickier still is the requirement that for real creation to take place, not even the creator could be there; a most unfavorable condition to be for someone who wants to get any real work done.
Indeed the notion of creation is humanity’s most embarrassing oxymoron. Surprisingly, humans have believed in it almost since the beginning of modern civilization. Interestingly, the possibility of creation can not be proven no matter what lengthy arguments are brought to bear. Its impossibility, on the other hand, is easily demonstrated in only seconds. We do say that people “create” things, but, indeed, no one creates anything. Its confusion with “creation” and “transformation.” Transformation takes place when already existing elements are combined to generate new structures. Transformations produced by humans are not proof of something coming into existence; but, rather, proof that man has a unique ability to transform elements, which already exist, into entirely new forms. Energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Even for the supporters of the “Big Bang” theory like myself:
How sure are we that this big bang was the first? From where did that initial source of energy materialize anyway, from nowhere? Is it even remotely possible that absolutely nothing could have exploded into all of this? How does something blow-up that isn’t there?
Man is accustomed to witnessing the birth of a child or the destruction of an inanimate object and surmising he has witnessed the emergence or annihilation of existence itself. He has not. He has only witnessed a fleeting moment of transformation. That which we interpret as the beginning or the end of physical form is, indeed, but the almost magical-like illusion created by snap-shot observations of an eternally evolving universe.
The concept of creation is self-contradictory.
The concept of creation is impossible. From “nothingness”, only “nothing” can emerge. Given that creation, as a reality, is self-contradictory, GOD’s existence is impossible.
God Is Impossible By definition, creation requires that nothing initially exist, yet to affirm that from nothingness anything whatsoever could materialize, would be self-contradictory. After all, if someone really wanted to create something, just remember what there would be to work with… nothing! And nothing is nothing, no matter what kind kick-ass illusionist might want to fashion from its confines. Trickier still is the requirement that for real creation to take place, not even the creator could be there; a most unfavorable condition to be for someone who wants to get any real work done.
Indeed the notion of creation is humanity’s most embarrassing oxymoron. Surprisingly, humans have believed in it almost since the beginning of modern civilization. Interestingly, the possibility of creation can not be proven no matter what lengthy arguments are brought to bear. Its impossibility, on the other hand, is easily demonstrated in only seconds. We do say that people “create” things, but, indeed, no one creates anything. Its confusion with “creation” and “transformation.” Transformation takes place when already existing elements are combined to generate new structures. Transformations produced by humans are not proof of something coming into existence; but, rather, proof that man has a unique ability to transform elements, which already exist, into entirely new forms. Energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Even for the supporters of the “Big Bang” theory like myself:
How sure are we that this big bang was the first? From where did that initial source of energy materialize anyway, from nowhere? Is it even remotely possible that absolutely nothing could have exploded into all of this? How does something blow-up that isn’t there?
Man is accustomed to witnessing the birth of a child or the destruction of an inanimate object and surmising he has witnessed the emergence or annihilation of existence itself. He has not. He has only witnessed a fleeting moment of transformation. That which we interpret as the beginning or the end of physical form is, indeed, but the almost magical-like illusion created by snap-shot observations of an eternally evolving universe.
