(December 18, 2013 at 5:15 am)Esquilax Wrote: Hey, does anyone else find it funny that enrico crows about evidence all the time, but when he's actually given some that refutes his claim- like I gave him days ago, back on page seven- he stays conspicuously silent?
Just thought I'd remind everyone that that happened.
How silly you are.
Your so call evidence is no evidence at all.
If you look here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7621608.stm
which is one of your link you will find that the study is still going on and so far NO evidence to back your claim has been found.
On the contrary evidence has been found that the consciousness can be separated from the body when several NDE,s saw from above their bodies things that they never seen before when alive.
1) One NDE saw inside one room and once back in his body described what was inside. Witness check that room and reported that it was as described by the NDE person.
2) One NDE once above his body saw a nurse in particular section of the hospital dropping a baby on the floor.
The baby got some fracture and started crying a lot.
The nurse did not tell anyone in order not to get into trouble so nobody knew why the baby was crying.
When the NDE person came back into his body told about the incident that he saw during his NDE so the doctors could fix the baby fracture.
These things really happened and there are witness to it as described in this book.http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Book-Near-Death-Experiences/dp/1571745475
So why should i believe people still studying these things and not concrete evidence by people who witness these events?
As i said again and again theories without evidence are like farts and that are your so called evidence that evidence are not.
