I need a volunteer

[Esquilax]

Very strange indeed.
When someone tell you that God exist you ask for concrete evidence but when you come up with your so called truth you say that science can not give concrete evidence on the excuse that this is intellectual honesty.

Actually, I ask for any evidence at all. Something you and every other godwad has failed miserably to produce.

Oh, and you're kind of dishonestly twisting what I actually said here; I said nothing about science's inability to provide evidence, because there's evidence all over that report. What I said was that proper science never professes certainty: they always allow for the possibility that they don't know everything yet. They still have evidence that informs the reportage they've done, that "may have" language just accounts for the possibility of new evidence.

But that evidence would have to be provided before one is rationally justified in throwing out the findings of the current report.

What a bullshit boy.
What a dung bullshit! hock:hock:
Shame on you and your so called honesty.

For someone who just lied about what I actually said to safeguard your own delusions, it's pretty rich to see you shaming anyone else.

........the determinations he has
One more failing.
You say HE when in fact The Big Book of Near-Death Experiences has been written by a lady.

Don't even care: I looked at the author's credentials, found none in neuroscience. In fact, barring an honorary degree in therapeutic counselling, all she has is credentials from a "college of spiritual and psychic studies." Not exactly a leader in science, that; remember, I asked you for actual scientific evidence, and this was the person you brought up.

Though, yes: a lady. Apologies for the pronoun mixup.

This show that you haven't read that book and yet you try to judge and dismiss what is written as garbage.
Shame on you boy. hock:

No, I haven't read it: given that the author has no education in the relevant fields, doing so would be pointless. She literally has no idea what she's talking about... have you not been paying attention to what I'm saying?

In the book that i am talking about (above) there are plenty of references so don't talk garbage.

Anecdotes aren't references, genius. And a fucking high school science report has references too, that doesn't mean it's one hundred percent right.

Besides, if you'd actually read the sentence you quoted before you disagreed with it, you might have seen that I was talking about the references I had given, not the scientists.

Beside your scientists can be accredited as much as you like but as far as they have not come up with pure and concrete evidence they haven't solved any problem so far.
That means that so far you got nothing in your hands.

Ooh, look at them goalposts move! What do you mean, "pure and concrete evidence?" They have literally one hundred percent more scientifically valid evidence than you do, you know... being real scientists.

Again: science doesn't profess certainty. It's intellectually honest. But the current evidence disagrees with your views, rico. That's where the weight of it leads, because that's where the people educated enough to make the determinations have gone. You have the burden of proof here; do you have any evidence beyond the anecdotal ramblings of an uneducated person who seriously attended a psychic college?

How do you know that i didn't look at your links.

Because you missed the date at the tops of the pages.

I look at them and as soon i saw that they bring no concrete evidence i decided not to bring them up.
Why should i waste my time discussing them when scientists still haven't come up with concrete evidence?

Oh right, I forgot you were a fucking idiot who will never relinquish your grip on the arbitrary determinations you've already made. What have I told you about science like six times on this page so far, moron?

Merry Christmas boy.
Be happy and try not to get too cranky.
Don't let your cells die.

Go fuck yourself, troll.