I need a volunteer

[Esquilax]

You see, you are still stuck in the corral of dogma.

Hoo boy, here we go again. For a guy who shat on others a few pages ago for repeating themselves, you sure do it a lot.

In other words you say that if intuitional science is not understood by science then is nothing.

No, I'm saying that if "intuitional science" is a science then it produces hypotheses and testable predictions that lead to applications in the real world, which is something I'd imagine you'd be all to happy to explain to us, if there actually were any.

But this is like the fourth time I've asked you this question, and it's the fourth time you've dodged it rather than providing an answer: at what point do we determine that your remarkable evasiveness is just down to the fact that you're simply making stuff up to legitimize the irrational prism through which you interpret the world, as though simply drawing the word science on your bullshit with crayon makes it reputable.

Now, can you produce any real results that intuitional science has produced, or not?

Again you can not bring any evidence that physical science is able to understand what is outside physicality.

You would first need to establish that there is something outside of physicality that science is failing to detect, which is another thing you've been asked multiple times, and another question you've dodged without providing anything.

You understand that you look like a conman or a fool, right?

The problem is to manage to bring it to the surface so it become part and parcel of us.

Have you established that consciousness is anything more than the emergent property of the brain that the current evidence shows it to be? No? Then stop putting the cart before the horse, moron.

Anyone else watched Dragonball Z Abridged? I feel quite like Frieza dealing with a verbally challenged Goku...

And with nary a muffin button in sight.